Les bookmarks de ClemShaared links2022-11-15T16:28:38+01:00http://caloine.ouvaton.org/shaarli/http://caloine.ouvaton.org/shaarli/http://caloine.ouvaton.org/shaarli/ShaarliList of sci hub and libgen active urls - Verts-Luisantshttp://caloine.ouvaton.org/shaarli/?Hu-AFw2022-11-15T16:28:38+01:002022-11-15T16:28:38+01:00— Permalink]]>A First Lesson in Econometrics | Journal of Political Economy: Vol 78, No 6http://caloine.ouvaton.org/shaarli/?C5r_gQ2021-12-20T21:01:11+01:002021-12-20T21:01:11+01:00— Permalink]]>Shit My Reviewers Sayhttp://caloine.ouvaton.org/shaarli/?ZT68RA2021-11-19T12:40:32+01:002021-11-19T12:40:32+01:00— Permalink]]>English as lingua franca. Or the sterilisation of scientific work - Ana Cristina Suzina, 2021http://caloine.ouvaton.org/shaarli/?BoOC9g2021-02-09T18:18:44+01:002021-02-09T18:18:44+01:00— Permalink]]>Science’s English dominance hinders diversity—but the community can work toward change | Science | AAAShttp://caloine.ouvaton.org/shaarli/?2idW6Q2021-02-09T18:17:37+01:002021-02-09T18:17:37+01:00— Permalink]]>Wuhan Coronavirus: What Does R0 Mean? - The Atlantichttp://caloine.ouvaton.org/shaarli/?Z6-tqA2020-02-02T15:22:46+01:002020-02-02T15:22:46+01:00— Permalink]]>Shaping a butterflyhttp://caloine.ouvaton.org/shaarli/?uz107Q2019-05-17T13:11:14+02:002019-05-17T13:11:14+02:00— Permalink]]>Why falsificationism is falsehttp://caloine.ouvaton.org/shaarli/?4E5Ajw2019-05-10T12:23:29+02:002019-05-10T12:23:29+02:00— Permalink]]>That adorable baby bear clip captures the dark side of wildlife videos - The Vergehttp://caloine.ouvaton.org/shaarli/?K2sQhg2018-11-06T16:44:00+01:002018-11-06T16:44:00+01:00— Permalink]]>Diversity in Ecology: Introverts | Journal of Ecology Bloghttp://caloine.ouvaton.org/shaarli/?iahinA2018-11-05T21:08:05+01:002018-11-05T21:08:05+01:00— Permalink]]>Facts, risks and emotions: – WintonCentre – Mediumhttp://caloine.ouvaton.org/shaarli/?mKmxsg2018-10-18T12:31:35+02:002018-10-18T12:31:35+02:00
"Officially we were supposed to ‘inform, educate, entertain’ and we thought we knew how to do all three. Now, though, I am beginning to question what exactly science communication is doing.
(...) Evidence presented purely to inform — balanced and not trying to persuade a person to agree or disagree — does not make for entertainment, almost by definition.
(...) in order to make a good decision, researchers believe that we first need to make ourselves imagine more than one potential future scenario. We need to open our minds to the possibility that things could turn out well or badly. We need emotion.
(...) We all have a right to be ‘informed and not persuaded’ — an ethical right and often a legal right. And yet training in communication focuses almost entirely on how to grab attention and how to manipulate emotions to tell a story — how to be persuasive. There is very little training on how to use emotions more subtly, in a way that opens minds to possibilities constructively, but is not designed to persuade (I’m certainly still learning how it might be done).
Of course in a competitive environment it is important to get your voice heard, and I often hear people say their objective is to persuade people to ‘do the right thing’. But who is defining ‘right’? If you as the communicator are — if you are defining the story — then you are not simply informing.
When people are making really important decisions — decisions about their health, their finances, about policies that will affect millions, or about someone’s guilt or innocence — I would now argue that a different kind of communication is needed: the skill to engage and be clear and to allow the audience to form their own story through the information, and to make their own decision at the end as to how to react to it."
— Permalink]]>Part Two – Speaking to Our Board about Peer Review – Relational Thinkinghttp://caloine.ouvaton.org/shaarli/?HeS5EA2018-09-13T12:33:01+02:002018-09-13T12:33:01+02:00— Permalink]]>Speaking to Our Board about Peer Review – Relational Thinkinghttp://caloine.ouvaton.org/shaarli/?dmZ5Fw2018-09-12T13:58:13+02:002018-09-12T13:58:13+02:00
Dommage que ça reste quand même très centré sur l'occident, et que ça ne cause pas trop Afrique ou Asie. Mais c'est intéressant.
— Permalink]]>Sciblogs | How to spot a badly-drawn DNA helixhttp://caloine.ouvaton.org/shaarli/?_bMtWA2018-08-22T16:15:21+02:002018-08-22T16:15:21+02:00— Permalink]]>Guilty of Loving You: A Multispecies Narrative - Susan Naomi Nordstrom, Amelie Nordstrom, Coonan Nordstrom, 2018http://caloine.ouvaton.org/shaarli/?-0OXlA2018-06-22T17:09:38+02:002018-06-22T17:09:38+02:00
L'article est encore plus chtarbé.
— Permalink]]>Evaluating Wikipedia as a Self-Learning Resource for Statistics: You Know They'll Use It: The American Statistician: Vol 0, No 0http://caloine.ouvaton.org/shaarli/?81aaSg2018-06-21T13:56:41+02:002018-06-21T13:56:41+02:00— Permalink]]>La guerre des fourmis - épisode 1http://caloine.ouvaton.org/shaarli/?tWqcQg2018-05-25T14:26:04+02:002018-05-25T14:26:04+02:00— Permalink]]>[1804.03732] Contest models highlight inefficiencies of scientific fundinghttp://caloine.ouvaton.org/shaarli/?1oEEJQ2018-04-13T09:40:11+02:002018-04-13T09:40:11+02:00— Permalink]]>Time to talk about why so many postgrads have poor mental healthhttp://caloine.ouvaton.org/shaarli/?Y-sl6Q2018-04-08T08:36:41+02:002018-04-08T08:36:41+02:00— Permalink]]>Why laughter in the lab can help your sciencehttp://caloine.ouvaton.org/shaarli/?m8bkeA2018-03-28T17:35:38+02:002018-03-28T17:35:38+02:00— Permalink]]>Reasons for an optimistic take on science: there are not "growing problems with research and publication practices." Rather, there have been, and continue to be, huge problems with research and publication practices, but we've made progress in recognizing these problems. - Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Sciencehttp://caloine.ouvaton.org/shaarli/?M6fYXA2018-03-14T12:33:37+01:002018-03-14T12:33:37+01:00
Enfin, c'est une réaction à chaud à l'article de blog, il faut que je lise le papier, le gars a peut-être des arguments pour me convaincre du contraire...
À lire donc
— Permalink]]>Sur Twitter, le faux plus fort que le vrai | {Sciences²}http://caloine.ouvaton.org/shaarli/?7NlDCQ2018-03-09T11:33:54+01:002018-03-09T11:33:54+01:00— Permalink]]>Existential Risk Research Network | X-Risk Research Network | www.x-risk.nethttp://caloine.ouvaton.org/shaarli/?mDyzyw2018-02-22T16:28:29+01:002018-02-22T16:28:29+01:00— Permalink]]>Frontiers | Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability | Frontiers in Human Neurosciencehttp://caloine.ouvaton.org/shaarli/?66wmMw2018-02-21T14:58:53+01:002018-02-21T14:58:53+01:00— Permalink]]>Alice's Adventures in Numberlandhttp://caloine.ouvaton.org/shaarli/?FznoIg2017-12-21T10:41:01+01:002017-12-21T10:41:01+01:00
À lire un jour...
— Permalink]]>Does Peppa Pig encourage inappropriate use of primary care resources? | The BMJhttp://caloine.ouvaton.org/shaarli/?fQDO3Q2017-12-21T07:53:04+01:002017-12-21T07:53:04+01:00— Permalink]]>PCI Evol Biolhttp://caloine.ouvaton.org/shaarli/?HTGDbg2017-12-06T20:59:45+01:002017-12-06T20:59:45+01:00— Permalink]]>Streaming video: X-rayshttp://caloine.ouvaton.org/shaarli/?9ewj_g2017-12-01T22:13:04+01:002017-12-01T22:13:04+01:00
Une description de ce que ça implique: http://www.futura-sciences.com/sciences/actualites/physique-radiographies-ruban-adhesif-17160/ — Permalink]]>Le rouleau de scotch, source de rayons X - Sciencesetavenir.frhttp://caloine.ouvaton.org/shaarli/?WEsscA2017-12-01T21:59:41+01:002017-12-01T21:59:41+01:00— Permalink]]>The Fallacy of Open-Access Publication - The Chronicle of Higher Educationhttp://caloine.ouvaton.org/shaarli/?is5tTA2017-11-18T18:58:37+01:002017-11-18T18:58:37+01:00— Permalink]]>Statistical Engineering: An Idea Whose Time Has Come?: The American Statistician: Vol 71, No 3http://caloine.ouvaton.org/shaarli/?-w8rcA2017-10-23T17:43:39+02:002017-10-23T17:43:39+02:00— Permalink]]>"Why bioRxiv can’t be the Central Service" - Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Sciencehttp://caloine.ouvaton.org/shaarli/?glFaeA2017-10-11T22:55:34+02:002017-10-11T22:55:34+02:00— Permalink]]>‘Greater humility about what our discipline can bring could, paradoxically, strengthen our contribution’ | The Psychologisthttp://caloine.ouvaton.org/shaarli/?RcvHGw2017-09-20T15:10:57+02:002017-09-20T15:10:57+02:00— Permalink]]>Cargo Cult Sciencehttp://caloine.ouvaton.org/shaarli/?vj1VQQ2017-09-16T22:22:22+02:002017-09-16T22:22:22+02:00— Permalink]]>A 1980 Letter on the Risk of Opioid Addictionhttp://caloine.ouvaton.org/shaarli/?260K4g2017-09-04T11:03:01+02:002017-09-04T11:03:01+02:00http://www.lemonde.fr/idees/article/2017/09/02/comment-cinq-phrases-ont-precipite-la-crise-des-opioides_5180036_3232.html, derrière un paywall, mais recopié ici: https://www.reddit.com/r/france/comments/6xu4vn/comment_cinq_phrases_ont_pr%C3%A9cipit%C3%A9_la_crise_des/dmigdvh/)
Il y a en ce moment aux USA une épidémie monstrueuse d'addiction aux opioïdes, avec 183 000 morts par overdose de 1999 à 2015, et des millions de personnes dépendantes. Une des principales causes de cette épidémie vient du fait que les médecins ont prescrit pendant 15 ans les opioïdes comme anti-douleurs systématiquement.
Alors on pourrait se dire que c'est complètement con, que les médecins auraient pu se douter que les opioïdes génèreraient de la dépendance. Mais c'est la solution de facilité (réflexe, les toubibs nord-américains
dégainent immédiatement l'opioïde dès qu'un patient dit qu'il a mal), et sortent pour leur défense les 600 papiers de la littérature qui affirment que ces opioïdes ne génèrent pas de dépendance quand ils sont
utilisés comme anti-douleur.
L'article de Leung et al. fait une étude bibliométrique de ces 600 papiers. Ils citent tous le même article à l'appui de cette affirmation, une lettre de 1980 de cinq phrases publiée dans un canard médical. Et
cette lettre indique que les opioïdes administrés très temporairement à l'hopital comme anti-douleur ne conduisent que rarement à de la dépendance. Ce qui s'est traduit dans la biblio par "les opioïdes ne
génèrent pas de dépendance quand utilisés comme anti-douleurs". Voir en particuliers la section 3 de l'annexe de l'article, qui contient des citations montrant à quel point les auteurs déforment la
lettre originale.
Exemple édifiant de citation de papiers par une majorité de gens qui ne l'ont pas lu (ou compris), avec toutes les conséquences que ça peut induire. Bon après, ce n'est pas la seule cause à cette épidémie (les
industries pharmaceutiques ne sont pas innocentes dans la diffusion du produit non plus), mais les conséquences ne sont pas anodines.
Moralité : toujours lire les citations fondamentales.
— Permalink]]>Demonstration of causal power of absenceshttp://caloine.ouvaton.org/shaarli/?YIx5uQ2017-05-11T15:05:21+02:002017-05-11T15:05:21+02:00— Permalink]]>Peer Community in … – A free recommendation process of published and unpublished scientific papers based on peer reviews (photo credit: Ben Lee, Stockholm library)http://caloine.ouvaton.org/shaarli/?0zt86g2017-03-10T13:45:37+01:002017-03-10T13:45:37+01:00— Permalink]]>Agence Nationale de l'Excellence Scientifique – ANES – For a better excellence, and beyondhttp://caloine.ouvaton.org/shaarli/?cmResA2017-01-10T16:55:28+01:002017-01-10T16:55:28+01:00— Permalink]]>Impactstoryhttp://caloine.ouvaton.org/shaarli/?WTCOrw2016-11-18T15:47:25+01:002016-11-18T15:47:25+01:00
Plein de métrique pour mesurer la qualité d'un chercheur. Par contre, j'ai l'impression qu'on ne peut voir que son propre profil.
— Permalink]]>Accueil - Encyclopédie de l'environnementhttp://caloine.ouvaton.org/shaarli/?-XtzDQ2016-10-07T11:25:11+02:002016-10-07T11:25:11+02:00— Permalink]]>Expert Elicitation Methods in Quantifying the Consequences of Acoustic Disturbance from Offshore Renewable Energy Developments - Springerhttp://caloine.ouvaton.org/shaarli/?iN_x7g2016-10-07T09:35:24+02:002016-10-07T09:35:24+02:00— Permalink]]>Publonshttp://caloine.ouvaton.org/shaarli/?fQPCuQ2016-10-05T12:19:49+02:002016-10-05T12:19:49+02:00https://publons.com/author/1181781/bob-ohara#profile
Je vais m'inscrire aussi, on verra bien
— Permalink]]>Meta-analysis of faculty's teaching effectiveness: Student evaluation of teaching ratings and student learning are not relatedhttp://caloine.ouvaton.org/shaarli/?VYvQcQ2016-09-26T11:48:25+02:002016-09-26T11:48:25+02:00— Permalink]]>How publishing in open access journals threatens science and what we can do about it - Romesburg - 2016 - The Journal of Wildlife Management - Wiley Online Libraryhttp://caloine.ouvaton.org/shaarli/?iQwgIg2016-06-22T09:24:54+02:002016-06-22T09:24:54+02:00— Permalink]]>How to fit an elephanthttp://caloine.ouvaton.org/shaarli/?FnyG9Q2016-05-17T16:39:55+02:002016-05-17T16:39:55+02:00
Ya des siphonnés qui l'ont pris au pied de la lettre, et qui expliquent comment faire (Mayer et al. 2010).
Le code python est dispo
— Permalink]]>Mendeley welcomes the SSRN Community!http://caloine.ouvaton.org/shaarli/?5WLOMw2016-05-17T16:37:42+02:002016-05-17T16:37:42+02:00— Permalink]]>Greenpeace files complaint about UW fishery professor | The Seattle Timeshttp://caloine.ouvaton.org/shaarli/?7frhsQ2016-05-12T16:20:08+02:002016-05-12T16:20:08+02:00— Permalink]]>Who's downloading pirated papers? Everyone | Science | AAAShttp://caloine.ouvaton.org/shaarli/?xkSrVg2016-05-03T09:33:05+02:002016-05-03T09:33:05+02:00— Permalink]]>[1604.01544] Day of the week effect in paper submission/acceptance/rejection to/in/by peer review journalshttp://caloine.ouvaton.org/shaarli/?qfTsPg2016-04-07T09:30:50+02:002016-04-07T09:30:50+02:00
Mais bon, hein, bon.
— Permalink]]>I skype therefore I am a scientist? | Dynamic Ecologyhttp://caloine.ouvaton.org/shaarli/?ANlP4w2016-04-05T12:34:32+02:002016-04-05T12:34:32+02:00— Permalink]]>